State v. White

647 N.E.2d 787, 72 Ohio St. 3d 91
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 26, 1995·No. No. 94-2467·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in its opinion.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Wright, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. White, 647 N.E.2d 787, 72 Ohio St. 3d 91 (Ohio 1995).

647 N.E.2d 787 (State v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fernando Lopez v. Julius Wilson, Warden
426 F.3d 339 (Sixth Circuit, 2005)
Lopez v. Wilson
Sixth Circuit, 2005
Lambert v. Warden
81 F. App'x 1 (Sixth Circuit, 2003)
Frederick White v. James Schotten, Warden
201 F.3d 743 (Sixth Circuit, 2000)
White v. Schotten
Sixth Circuit, 2000
State v. Paris
1996 Ohio 30 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)
State v. White
1995 Ohio 6 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)