State v. Paris

667 N.E.2d 390, 76 Ohio St. 3d 270
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 7, 1996·No. No. 95-2425·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in its decision. See State v. White (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 91, 647 N.E.2d 787.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Paris, 667 N.E.2d 390, 76 Ohio St. 3d 270 (Ohio 1996).

667 N.E.2d 390 (State v. Paris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Paris
1996 Ohio 30 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)