State v. White

365 S.W.3d 255, 2012 WL 951856, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 352
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 20, 2012·No. ED 96403·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Yancy White (Defendant) appeals the judgment of conviction entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis after a jury found him guilty of three counts of armed robbery in the first degree and three counts of armed criminal action. Defendant claims that the trial court erred by: 1) denying his motion to suppress identification evidence from two victims and overruling his objections to that evidence at trial; and 2) overruling his objection to his in-court identification by two victims.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the trial court did not abuse its discretion. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. White, 365 S.W.3d 255, 2012 WL 951856, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 352 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

365 S.W.3d 255 (State v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

White v. State
555 S.W.3d 483 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2018)