State v. White

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. White

309 S.W.3d 343, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 163, 2010 WL 528074

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 16, 2010

DocketED 92776

StatusPublished

This text of 309 S.W.3d 343 (State v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. White, 309 S.W.3d 343, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 163, 2010 WL 528074 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Antonio R. White, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of assault in the first degree, in violation of section 565.050 RSMo (2000), and armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a prior and persistent offender and sentenced him to thirty years imprisonment for assault and ten years imprisonment for armed criminal action, to be served concurrently. No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Antonio R. White, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of assault in the first degree, in violation of section 565.050 RSMo (2000), and armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a prior and persistent offender and sentenced him to thirty years imprisonment for assault and ten years imprisonment for armed criminal action, to be served concurrently. No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

309 S.W.3d 343, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 163, 2010 WL 528074, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-white-moctapp-2010.