State v. White

366 S.W.3d 82, 2012 WL 1623553, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 612
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 9, 2012·No. ED 96848·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rodney E. White appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury for robbery in the first degree, in violation of Section 569.020, RSMo 2000, 1 and armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015. We affirm.

*83 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. Unless otherwise indicated, all further references are to RSMo 2000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. White, 366 S.W.3d 82, 2012 WL 1623553, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 612 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

366 S.W.3d 82 (State v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beaver v. Beaver
366 S.W.3d 82 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)