State v. White
154 S.W.3d 533, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 215, 2005 WL 286931
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. White. Read the opinion of the Court — 92 S.W.3d 183 →
Opinion
ORDER
Marq White appeals from his jury conviction on charges of first-degree murder and armed criminal action. He contends the trial court erred in excluding impeachment evidence against a prosecution witness. Upon review of the record, we find no prejudicial error and affirm the convictions. The parties have been provided with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. White, 154 S.W.3d 533, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 215, 2005 WL 286931 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).
154 S.W.3d 533 (State v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.