State v. White

113 S.W.3d 677, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1200, 2003 WL 21744376
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. White. Read the opinion of the Court — 92 S.W.3d 183
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 29, 2003·No. No. WD 61790·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted Raymond White of assault in the first degree and armed criminal action. On appeal, he alleges that the trial court clearly erred in overruling his Batson objection to the prosecutor’s use of its peremptory strike to remove an African-American venireperson from the panel. Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986).

We find no inherently discriminatory intent in the prosecutor’s explanation for its striking the venireperson from the jury panel. Appellant failed to show that the prosecutor’s proffered reasons for the strike were merely pretextual and that the strike was racially motivated.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. White, 113 S.W.3d 677, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1200, 2003 WL 21744376 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

113 S.W.3d 677 (State v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Batson v. Kentucky
476 U.S. 79 (Supreme Court, 1986)