State v. White

147 S.W.3d 931, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1702, 2004 WL 2524898
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. White. Read the opinion of the Court — 92 S.W.3d 183
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 9, 2004·No. No. WD 63474·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

David W. White appeals the judgment of his conviction, after a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Linn County, of attempting to sell a controlled substance, methamphetamine, in violation of § 195.211 and § 564.011.1.1 As a result of his conviction, he was sentenced, as a prior drug offender, § 195.275, to twenty years imprisonment in the Missouri Department of Corrections.

In his sole point on appeal, the appellant claims that the trial court erred in denying his “motion for judgment of acquittal notwithstanding the verdict and/or his motion for new trial because there was insufficient evidence to support the guilty verdict.”

We affirm pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. White, 147 S.W.3d 931, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1702, 2004 WL 2524898 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

147 S.W.3d 931 (State v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.