State v. White
This text of 595 S.W.2d 777 (State v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon a jury trial in November 1978, defendant was found guilty of robbery in the first degree, armed criminal action and assault with intent to kill without malice. Defendant appeals on the sole ground that the jury was selected in a manner unconstitutionally discriminating against women in violation of Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357, 99 S.Ct. 664, 58 L.Ed.2d 579 (1979).
Defendant’s contention must be sustained. The state’s argument in opposition, by its own concession, has previously been rejected by this court. State v. Hawkins, 582 S.W.2d 333 (Mo.App.1979); State v. Donahue, 585 S.W.2d 160 (Mo.App.1979); State v. Beavers, 591 S.W.2d 215 (Mo.App.1979). We adhere to those rulings.
The judgment is reversed and the case remanded for a new trial.1
All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
595 S.W.2d 777, 1980 Mo. App. LEXIS 3095, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-white-moctapp-1980.