State v. Sinclair
Opinions
[74] Reexamination on order of the United States Supreme Court
This case together with several others 1 was ordered reexamined in light of Albernaz v. United States, 450 U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 1137, 67 L,.Ed.2d 275 (1981). Since all of the courts of appeals rulings were based upon our ruling in Sours v. State, 593 S.W.2d 208 (Mo.banc 1980) (Sours I) or Sours v. State, 603 S.W.2d 592 (Mo.banc 1980) (Sours II), the cases were all ordered transferred to this Court. Our examination of the double jeopardy issue made in light of Albernaz pursuant to the orders of the United States Supreme Court, appears in State v. Haggard, 619 S.W.2d 44 (Mo.banc No. 62227), decided July 14, 1981.
The original opinion filed by the Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, State v. Sinclair, 606 S.W.2d 271 (Mo.App.1980), is approved and affirmed and by reference made a part of this opinion. Sours v. State, 603 S.W.2d 592 (Mo.banc 1980) (Sours II), cert. denied, Missouri v. Sours, - U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 953, 67 L.Ed.2d 118 (1981); and State v. Haggard, 619 S.W.2d 44 (Mo.banc 1981).
The sentence and judgment for armed criminal action is reversed and set aside. The sentence and judgment of conviction for second degree assault is affirmed.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
619 S.W.2d 73 (State v. Sinclair) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.