Anderson v. State
This text of 629 S.W.2d 421 (Anderson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This ease is another among the flurry of appeals involving the impact of Sours v. State, 593 S.W.2d 208 (Mo. banc), (Sours I), vacated, 446 U.S. 962, 100 S.Ct. 2935, 64 L.Ed.2d 820, on remand, 603 S.W.2d 592 (Mo. banc 1980), (Sours II), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1131, 101 S.Ct. 953, 67 L.Ed.2d 118 (1981). Defendant filed his Rule 27.26 motion challenging, inter alia, his armed criminal action convictions. § 559.225, RSMo. Supp.1976.
Defendant had pleaded guilty to two counts of first degree robbery and two counts of armed criminal action, with sentences on the latter concurrent with those imposed for robbery. Following a hearing, the trial court sustained that portion of the motion relating to the convictions for armed criminal action, finding a double jeopardy violation based on Sours I. The state has appealed urging that Albernaz v. United States, 450 U.S. 333, 101 S.Ct. 1137, 67 L.Ed.2d 275 (1981), and other United States Supreme Court decisions hold that a legislature may properly enact legislation to impose separate punishment for separate crimes, albeit the crimes arise out of the same facts. But Sours I and II specifically hold that convictions and sentences for armed criminal action and first degree robbery cannot co-exist as being a double jeopardy violation. The Sours cases have been examined in the light of Albernaz and reaffirmed in State v. Haggard, 619 S.W.2d 44 (Mo. banc 1981).1 We comply with the clear dictate of the Missouri Supreme Court and affirm the trial court’s ruling which reverses the defendant’s armed criminal action convictions. State v. Harris, 622 S.W.2d 330 (Mo.App.1981); State ex rel. Westfall v. Crowder, 621 S.W.2d 717 (Mo.App.1981).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
629 S.W.2d 421, 1981 Mo. App. LEXIS 3815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-state-moctapp-1981.