State v. Wells

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Wells

706 So. 2d 934, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1836, 1998 WL 75145

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 25, 1998

DocketNo. 97-2012

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 706 So. 2d 934 (State v. Wells) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wells, 706 So. 2d 934, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1836, 1998 WL 75145 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals from an order which granted a writ of coram nobis setting aside a conviction entered on a guilty plea because of alleged ineffective assistance of counsel.¹ Because, as we have recently and definitively held in Peart v. State, 705 So.2d 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (en banc), coram nobis does not lie on such a ground,² the judgment under review is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to dismiss the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals from an order which granted a writ of coram nobis setting aside a conviction entered on a guilty plea because of alleged ineffective assistance of counsel.¹ Because, as we have recently and definitively held in Peart v. State, 705 So.2d 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (en banc), coram nobis does not lie on such a ground,² the judgment under review is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to dismiss the petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

706 So. 2d 934, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1836, 1998 WL 75145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wells-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack