State v. Wells

706 So. 2d 934, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1836, 1998 WL 75145
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 25, 1998·No. No. 97-2012·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals from an order which granted a writ of coram nobis setting aside a conviction entered on a guilty plea because of alleged ineffective assistance of counsel.1 Because, as we have recently and definitively held in Peart v. State, 705 So.2d 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (en banc), coram nobis does not lie on such a ground,2 the judgment under review is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to dismiss the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Wells, 706 So. 2d 934, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1836, 1998 WL 75145 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

706 So. 2d 934 (State v. Wells) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wells v. State
788 So. 2d 200 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)