Wells v. State
This text of 788 So. 2d 200 (Wells v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
We have for review State v. Wells, 706 So.2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), which is a per curiam decision citing Peart v. State, 705 So.2d 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), quashed 756 So.2d 42 (Fla.2000), which was then pending review in this Court. We have jurisdiction. See Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 420 (Fla.1981).
Consistent with our decision in Wood v. State, 750 So.2d 592 (Fla.1999), we find that Wells’ ineffective assistance of counsel claim was properly raised in a petition for writ of error coram nobis. Accordingly, we quash the decision below and remand to the district court for consideration on the merits.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
788 So. 2d 200, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 84, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 327, 2001 WL 123875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-v-state-fla-2001.