State v. Washington

352 S.W.3d 421, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1494
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Washington. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 750
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 8, 2011·No. No. ED 96017·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Washington (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered after a bench trial finding him guilty of first-degree attempted sodomy. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that there was sufficient evidence to find Appellant guilty of first-degree attempted sodomy beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Johnson, 244 S.W.3d 144, 152 (Mo.banc 2008). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Washington, 352 S.W.3d 421, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1494 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

352 S.W.3d 421 (State v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Johnson
244 S.W.3d 144 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2008)