State v. Washington

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Washington

397 S.W.3d 458, 2013 WL 152442, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 53

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 15, 2013·No. Nos. WD 74250, WD 74293·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Anthony C. Washington appeals his convictions and sentences for stealing, section 570.030, and forgery, section 570.090, after a jury trial. Mr. Washington challenges the evidence supporting the stealing conviction, the qualification of a juror to serve on the jury, and the grant of the State’s motion to consolidate the separate cases of stealing and forgery for trial.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 80.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Anthony C. Washington appeals his convictions and sentences for stealing, section 570.030, and forgery, section 570.090, after a jury trial. Mr. Washington challenges the evidence supporting the stealing conviction, the qualification of a juror to serve on the jury, and the grant of the State’s motion to consolidate the separate cases of stealing and forgery for trial.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 80.25(b).

State v. Washington, 397 S.W.3d 458, 2013 WL 152442, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 53 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

397 S.W.3d 458 (State v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related