State v. Washington
This text of 352 S.W.3d 421 (State v. Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent,
v.
Thomas WASHINGTON, Defendant/Appellant.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Mary H. Moore, Jefferson City, MO, for Plaintiff/Respondent.
Timothy J. Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for Defendant/Appellant.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Thomas Washington (Appellant) appeals from the trial court's judgment entered after a bench trial finding him guilty of first-degree attempted sodomy. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that there was sufficient evidence to find Appellant guilty of first-degree attempted sodomy beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Johnson, 244 S.W.3d 144, 152 (Mo.banc 2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
352 S.W.3d 421, 2011 WL 5374583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-washington-moctapp-2011.