State v. Ward

650 P.2d 163, 59 Or. App. 42, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 3797
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided September 1, 1982·No. No. 81-1741, CA A22962; No. 79-1988 CA A22963; No. 79-1905 CA A22964·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals the sentence imposed after his conviction for burglary in the second degree, ORS 164.215, and revocation of his probation on previous burglary convictions. The only matter requiring a written opinion is defendant’s argument that ordering the sentence on this burglary conviction to run consecutively to a 1980 Douglas County sentence was improper, because, at the time of sentencing, his probation on the Douglas County sentence had not been revoked. He correctly relies on State v. DeChenne, 39 Or App 901, 594 P2d 831 (1979).

Remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Ward, 650 P.2d 163, 59 Or. App. 42, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 3797 (Or. Ct. App. 1982).

650 P.2d 163 (State v. Ward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Walker
713 P.2d 666 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1986)
State v. McAllister
705 P.2d 243 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1985)
State v. Mastrilli
661 P.2d 124 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1983)
State v. Ward
650 P.2d 164 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1982)