Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Mastrilli

State v. Mastrilli

661 P.2d 124, 62 Or. App. 464, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 2764
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided April 6, 1983·No. 44601; CA A24858·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of burglary. He assigns six errors on appeal. We find merit only in the last, which concerns the sentence imposed. The trial judge directed that, inter alia, the sentence be served consecutively “* * * to any time the defendant is [hereafter] ordered to serve as a result of parole violation in Montana if the defendant is returned to Montana before this sentence is served.” Imposing a sentence consecutive to an as yet unexecuted sentence is impermissible. See State v. DeChenne, 39 Or App 901, 594 P2d 831 (1979); State v. Ward, 59 Or App 42, 650 P2d 164 (1982).

The state agrees that, if the challenged phrase is deemed impermissible, it may be deleted without remanding the case for resentencing. See Or Const, Art VII (Amended), § 3. It is so ordered.

Judgment of conviction affirmed. Sentence modified by deleting requirement that defendant serve the term imposed consecutively to any sentence which may be imposed for parole violation in Montana.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Mastrilli, 661 P.2d 124, 62 Or. App. 464, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 2764 (Or. Ct. App. 1983).

661 P.2d 124 (State v. Mastrilli) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Trudeau
487 N.W.2d 11 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1992)
People v. Lucero
772 P.2d 58 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1989)
State v. Smith
767 P.2d 480 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1989)
State v. Blevins
394 N.W.2d 663 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1986)
In Re the Personal Restraint of Chapman
713 P.2d 106 (Washington Supreme Court, 1986)
State v. Walker
713 P.2d 666 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1986)
State v. Mastrilli
661 P.2d 124 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1983)