State v. Uskert

704 N.E.2d 582, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1476, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 233
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 21, 1999
Docket98-217
StatusPublished

This text of 704 N.E.2d 582 (State v. Uskert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Uskert, 704 N.E.2d 582, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1476, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 233 (Ohio 1999).

Opinion

Ashland App. No. 97COA01219. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Ashland County. Upon consideration' of appellant’s motion for admission pro hoc vice of Edward B. Foley by Betty D. Montgomery,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for admission pro hac vice be, and hereby is, granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
704 N.E.2d 582, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1476, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-uskert-ohio-1999.