State v. Brown
This text of 2017 Ohio 64 (State v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State v. Brown, 2017-Ohio-64.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
State of Ohio, :
Plaintiff-Appellee, :
v. : No. 16AP-634 (C.P.C. No. 09CR-5367) Victor L. Brown, : (ACCELERATED CALENDAR) Defendant-Appellant. :
D E C I S I O N
Rendered on January 10, 2017
On brief: Ron O'Brien, Prosecuting Attorney, and Steven L. Taylor, for appellee.
On brief: Victor L. Brown, pro se.
APPEAL from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas
TYACK, P.J. {¶ 1} Victor L. Brown is appealing from the trial court's refusal to order that the court costs be refunded which he paid in a criminal case in which he was the defendant. The State of Ohio has filed a brief in which it states that the costs should, in fact, be refunded to Brown. {¶ 2} We, therefore, sustain Brown's sole assignment of error which reads: The trial court has refused to follow the mandate of the Tenth District Court of Appeals when it directed the court to proceed in accordance of law that dismissed defendant's conviction and sentence but did not dismiss the fines associated with the conviction in contravention to law.
{¶ 3} Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and enter judgment compelling the refunding of the court costs in the amount of $138.57 collected in Brown's No. 16AP-634 2
case in which his conviction was vacated and in which his case was subsequently dismissed. Judgment reversed; Judgment entered for appellant.
BROWN and HORTON, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 Ohio 64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-brown-ohioctapp-2017.