State v. Turner
This text of 2012 Ohio 2203 (State v. Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State v. Turner, 132 Ohio St.3d 89, 2012-Ohio-2203.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. TURNER, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Turner, 132 Ohio St.3d 89, 2012-Ohio-2203.] Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. (No. 2011-1261—Submitted May 9, 2012—Decided May 23, 2012.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 95438, 2011-Ohio-2785. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. LANZINGER, J., dissents. __________________ William Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Matthew E. Meyer, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and John T. Martin, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. ______________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2012 Ohio 2203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-turner-ohio-2012.