State v. Turner

2012 Ohio 2203
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Turner. Read the opinion of the Court — 132 Ohio St. 3d 89
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 23, 2012·No. 2011-1261·Published

Opinion

[Cite as State v. Turner, 132 Ohio St.3d 89, 2012-Ohio-2203.]

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. TURNER, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Turner, 132 Ohio St.3d 89, 2012-Ohio-2203.] Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. (No. 2011-1261—Submitted May 9, 2012—Decided May 23, 2012.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 95438, 2011-Ohio-2785. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. LANZINGER, J., dissents. __________________ William Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Matthew E. Meyer, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and John T. Martin, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. ______________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Turner, 2012 Ohio 2203 (Ohio 2012).

2012 Ohio 2203 (State v. Turner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Turner
2011 Ohio 2785 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2011)
State v. Turner
132 Ohio St. 3d 89 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2012)