State v. Tunstall
722 S.E.2d 791, 2012 WL 892508
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 8, 2012
Docket323A92-8
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 722 S.E.2d 791 (State v. Tunstall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Tunstall, 722 S.E.2d 791, 2012 WL 892508 (N.C. 2012).
Opinion
STATE
v.
Charles Alonzo TUNSTALL.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Charles Alonzo Tunstall, Polkton, for Tunstall-Bey, Charles Alonzo.
Derrick Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, for State of N.C.
Sam Currin, District Attorney, for State of N.C.
The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th of January 2012 by Defendant for Appeal:
"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of March 2012."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
North Carolina State Bar v. Hunter
722 S.E.2d 791 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2012)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
722 S.E.2d 791, 2012 WL 892508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-tunstall-nc-2012.