Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/State v. Tunstall

State v. Tunstall

717 S.E.2d 559, 365 N.C. 344
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedAugust 25, 2011
Docket323A92-6
StatusPublished

This text of 717 S.E.2d 559 (State v. Tunstall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Tunstall, 717 S.E.2d 559, 365 N.C. 344 (N.C. 2011).

Opinion

717 S.E.2d 559 (2011)

STATE
v.
Charles Alonzo TUNSTALL.

No. 323A92-6.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 25, 2011.

Charles Alonzo Tunstall, Polkton, for Tunstall-Bey, Charles Alonzo.

William N. Farrell, Jr., Senior Deputy Attorney General, for State.

Sam Currin, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th of June 2011 by Defendant for Notice of Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th of August 2011."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
717 S.E.2d 559, 365 N.C. 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-tunstall-nc-2011.