Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/State v. Tunstall

State v. Tunstall

717 S.E.2d 559, 365 N.C. 344
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Tunstall. Read the opinion of the Court — 718 S.E.2d 149 →
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided August 25, 2011·No. 323A92-6·Published

Opinion

717 S.E.2d 559 (2011)

STATE
v.
Charles Alonzo TUNSTALL.

No. 323A92-6.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 25, 2011.

Charles Alonzo Tunstall, Polkton, for Tunstall-Bey, Charles Alonzo.

William N. Farrell, Jr., Senior Deputy Attorney General, for State.

Sam Currin, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th of June 2011 by Defendant for Notice of Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th of August 2011."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Tunstall, 717 S.E.2d 559, 365 N.C. 344 (N.C. 2011).

717 S.E.2d 559 (State v. Tunstall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.