Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Tremillion

State v. Tremillion

826 P.2d 95, 111 Or. App. 375, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 369
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedFebruary 12, 1992
DocketC89-11-36645; CA A68242
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 826 P.2d 95 (State v. Tremillion) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Tremillion, 826 P.2d 95, 111 Or. App. 375, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 369 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

*376 PER CURIAM

Defendant pled no contest to a charge of failure to perform the duties of a driver to injured persons (felony hit and run). ORS 811.705(1). The sentencing court imposed a sentence of 15 to 18 months imprisonment, the presumptive range for grid block 6 C. Defendant argues that the court erred in not sentencing him to a definite term of imprisonment.

The state concedes that defendant is correct. OAR 253-05-001 requires a term of imprisonment “within the durational range of months stated in the grid block.” OAR 253-05-005 requires that the judgment of conviction “shall state the length of incarceration * * *.” However, the state contends that the error requires no remedial action. We agree.

The sentence imposed is concurrent with a 58-month term of imprisonment for defendant’s conviction for kidnapping in the second degree, ORS 163.225, and cannot affect defendant’s actual period of imprisonment. There are ho adverse consequences about which he may complain. See State v. Dorsey, 44 Or App 721, 607 P2d 204 (1980); State v. Larsen, 44 Or App 643, 606 P2d 1159, rev den 289 Or 373 (1980); see also State v. Yost, 28 Or App 803, 561 P2d 657, rev den (1977).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Jones
362 P.3d 899 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2015)
State v. Fox
324 P.3d 608 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2014)
State v. Powell
288 P.3d 999 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2012)
State v. Mitchell
235 P.3d 725 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2010)
State v. Luers
153 P.3d 688 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2007)
State v. Gortler
134 P.3d 1108 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2006)
State v. Stalder
133 P.3d 920 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2006)
State v. Ignacio Gutierrez
106 P.3d 670 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2005)
State v. Daves
930 P.2d 265 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1996)
State v. MONTAZER
891 P.2d 662 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1995)
State v. Williams
883 P.2d 918 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1994)
State v. Dashel
868 P.2d 15 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1994)
State v. Baker
848 P.2d 661 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1993)
State v. Nelson
849 P.2d 1147 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1993)
State v. Miller
838 P.2d 79 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)
State v. Enos
836 P.2d 1347 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)
State v. Bottrell
826 P.2d 126 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)
State v. Ripka
827 P.2d 189 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
826 P.2d 95, 111 Or. App. 375, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-tremillion-orctapp-1992.