State v. Bottrell

826 P.2d 126, 111 Or. App. 652, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 392
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided February 26, 1992·No. C900395CR; CA A66994·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant challenges the sentence imposed after he pled guilty to two counts of burglary in the second degree. ORS 164.215. He contends that the sentencing court erred in placing him in grid block 2 F instead of 2 G. He argues that his prior convictions should have been calculated as one conviction, because they come within the requirements of OAR 253-04-006(3) and OAR 253-03-001(18).1

We do not reach the merits of defendant’s argument. The presumptive probationary sentence for grid block 2 F is the same as the presumptive probationary sentence for grid block 2 G. Defendant was sentenced within the presumptive range. There are no adverse consequences about which he may complain. State v. Tremillion, 111 Or App 375, 826 P2d 95 (1992).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Bottrell, 826 P.2d 126, 111 Or. App. 652, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 392 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

826 P.2d 126 (State v. Bottrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Tremillion
826 P.2d 95 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)