State v. Baker

848 P.2d 661, 119 Or. App. 144, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 533
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMarch 31, 1993
Docket10-91-00939 B, 10-91-01118 B; CA A71202, A71203
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 848 P.2d 661 (State v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Baker, 848 P.2d 661, 119 Or. App. 144, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 533 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals the 21-month prison term imposed for his conviction of burglary in the first degree. ORS 164.225. He was sentenced on four separate cases in one sentencing proceeding. His placement on the criminal history scale was F for the first conviction. The court then used that conviction to enhance his criminal history to C. Defendant is correct that that was error. State v. Bucholz, 113 Or App 705, 834 P2d 456 (1992), rev allowed 315 Or 311 (1993); State v. Seals, 113 Or App 700, 833 P2d 1344 (1992). However, the error requires no remedial action. The challenged sentence is concurrent to a 24-month term of imprisonment in a separate case. State v. Tremillion, 111 Or App 375, 826 P2d 95, rev den 313 Or 300 (1992).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Ignacio Gutierrez
106 P.3d 670 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
848 P.2d 661, 119 Or. App. 144, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-baker-orctapp-1993.