State v. Sutton

269 So. 2d 712, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 5925
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 15, 1972·No. No. 72-439·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

MANN, Judge.

A warrant was issued in Hendry County on October 19, 1971. Sutton was taken into custody on that date in Polk County, on an independent charge. Hendry County’s officers knew where Sutton was and lodged a detainer. Upon failure of the State to bring Sutton to trial within 18Ó days he moved for discharge under the speedy trial rule, CrPR 3.191, 33 F.S.A. The trial judge properly granted discharge. The State’s argument that the time began to run from the time the warrant was formally served on Sutton is without merit. He was in custody on these as well as other charges. There is no showing of non-availability under CrPR 3.191(e). He could have been tried within the time allowed by the rule. The State cannot enlarge the time merely by delaying deliberately the formal service of the warrant.

Affirmed.

PIERCE, C. J., and LILES, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Sutton, 269 So. 2d 712, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 5925 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

269 So. 2d 712 (State v. Sutton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eaddy v. State
352 So. 2d 98 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
State v. Bassham
352 So. 2d 55 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)
O'BRYAN v. State
326 So. 2d 83 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Stevenson v. State
300 So. 2d 281 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
State Ex Rel. Williams v. Eastmoore
297 So. 2d 572 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Hargrove v. State
281 So. 2d 390 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
State Ex Rel. Green v. Patterson, Pinellas County
279 So. 2d 362 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
State v. Sutton
269 So. 2d 713 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)