State v. Sneed

25 Tex. 66
Texas Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1860·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

Egberts, J.

—In this case the bar of the statute of limitations of one year was completed before the Code went into operation, by which the period of limitation of prosecutions in such misdemeanors was extended to two years. The State having neglected to prosecute within the time prescribed for its own action, lost the right to prosecute the suit. To give an Act of the Legislature, passed after such loss, the effect of reviving the right of action in the State, would give it an operation ex post facto, which we cannot suppose the Legislature intended.-

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Sneed, 25 Tex. 66 (Tex. 1860).

25 Tex. 66 (State v. Sneed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Eric Michael Heilman
413 S.W.3d 503 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2013)
Phillips, William Ray
362 S.W.3d 606 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2011)
Stogner v. California
539 U.S. 607 (Supreme Court, 2003)
United States v. Salberg
287 F. 208 (N.D. Ohio, 1923)
State v. Smith
107 P. 980 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1910)
Johnson v. People
50 N.E. 321 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1898)
Russell & Seisfeld v. Kirkbride
62 Tex. 455 (Texas Supreme Court, 1884)
Kring v. Missouri
107 U.S. 221 (Supreme Court, 1883)
Moore v. State
43 N.J.L. 203 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1881)