State v. Smith

183 S.E.2d 649, 279 N.C. 505, 1971 N.C. LEXIS 861
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 13, 1971·No. 54·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

SHARP, Justice.

Defendant’s case on appeal contains no assignment of error. Therefore, unless error appears on the face of the record proper, the judgment will be sustained. State v. Williams, 268 N.C. 295, 150 S.E. 2d 447.

“A plea of nolo contendere, like a plea of guilty, leaves open for review only the sufficiency of the indictment and waives all defenses other than that the indictment charges no offense.” State v. Stokes, 274 N.C. 409, 412, 163 S.E. 2d 770, 773. The indictment in this case properly charges the crime of murder in the words of G.S. 15-144. The sentence of thirty years is within the limits prescribed by G.S. 14-17 for murder in the second degree.

Defendant’s counsel, the public defender, concedes there is no error in the case. Our examination of the entire transcript discloses another appeal totally without justification. See State v. Roberts, ante; State v. Darnell, 266 N.C. 640, 146 S.E. 2d 800.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Smith, 183 S.E.2d 649, 279 N.C. 505, 1971 N.C. LEXIS 861 (N.C. 1971).

183 S.E.2d 649 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Alexander
Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2022
State v. Alexander
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2020
State v. Koonce
676 S.E.2d 669 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2009)
State v. Hughes
524 S.E.2d 63 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1999)
State v. Dixon
199 S.E.2d 467 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1973)
State v. Ford
185 S.E.2d 328 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1971)