State v. Ford

185 S.E.2d 328, 13 N.C. App. 34, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1153
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 15, 1971
DocketNo. 7121SC764
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 185 S.E.2d 328 (State v. Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Ford, 185 S.E.2d 328, 13 N.C. App. 34, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1153 (N.C. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinions

HEDRICK, Judge.

The record contains no exceptions or assignments of error. It affirmatively appears from the record that the defendant, represented by counsel, freely, understandingly and voluntarily entered a plea of nolo contendere to a valid bill of indictment, and the prison sentence imposed by the judgment is within the limits prescribed for a violation of the statute.

In the defendant’s trial in the superior court, we find no error.

No error.

Judge Graham concurs in the result. Chief Judge Mallard dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Blake
188 S.E.2d 607 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)
State v. Lindsey
188 S.E.2d 7 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 S.E.2d 328, 13 N.C. App. 34, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ford-ncctapp-1971.