State v. Ford
185 S.E.2d 328, 13 N.C. App. 34, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1153
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided December 15, 1971·No. No. 7121SC764·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinions
The record contains no exceptions or assignments of error. It affirmatively appears from the record that the defendant, represented by counsel, freely, understandingly and voluntarily entered a plea of nolo contendere to a valid bill of indictment, and the prison sentence imposed by the judgment is within the limits prescribed for a violation of the statute.
In the defendant’s trial in the superior court, we find no error.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Ford, 185 S.E.2d 328, 13 N.C. App. 34, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1153 (N.C. Ct. App. 1971).
185 S.E.2d 328 (State v. Ford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Blake
188 S.E.2d 607 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)
State v. Lindsey
188 S.E.2d 7 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)