State v. . Smith

146 S.E. 73, 196 N.C. 438, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 6
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 2, 1929·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Brogden, J.

It does not appear from the record that the defendant was offered an opportunity in open court to be heard upon the question as to whether he had violated the conditions upon which the original *439 judgment was suspended. Neither is there evidence or finding of fact to the effect that any of said conditions had been violated.

The exception of the defendant to the judgment appealed from is sustained. S. v. Hardin, 183 N. C., 815, 112 S. E., 593; S. v. Phillips, 185 N. C., 614, 115 S. E., 893; S. v. Gooding, 194 N. C., 271, 139 S. E., 436.

Costs constitute no part of the punishment of the defendant. S. v. Crook, 115 N. C., 760, 20 S. E., 513.

Liability for costs in criminal cases is regulated by 0. S., 1268-12Y0. These sections provide in substance that a defendant upon failing to pay costs may be imprisoned “until the costs shall be paid, or until he shall otherwise be discharged according to law.”

Error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . Smith, 146 S.E. 73, 196 N.C. 438, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 6 (N.C. 1929).

146 S.E. 73 (State v. . Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henry Thompson v. State of Missouri
570 S.W.3d 166 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2019)
State v. Pennell
746 S.E.2d 431 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2013)
State v. Davis
645 S.W.2d 160 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1982)
State v. Duncan
154 S.E.2d 53 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1967)
State v. Bowser
61 S.E.2d 98 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)
State v. Skypeck
65 N.E.2d 75 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1945)
State v. . Rhodes
180 S.E. 84 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
Wyatt v. Baker
154 S.E. 816 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
State v. . Cornett
150 S.E. 113 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1929)