State v. . Cornett

150 S.E. 113, 197 N.C. 627, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 319
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 30, 1929·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Adams, J".

The defendants were indicted and convicted of wilfully injuring and removing a fence surrounding a cultivated field in breach of C. S., 4317. Judgment was suspended, upon payment of the cost, until the termination of a pending civil action. The order for the payment of the cost is not a part of the punishment which may be imposed for the commission of a misdemeanor, the legal effect of the order being only to vest the right to the cost in those entitled to it. S. v. Crook, 115 N. C., 760; S. v. Smith, 196 N. C., 438. As no final judgment has been pronounced, the appeal must be dismissed. In a criminal action an appeal may be taken only from a final judgment on conviction or from one which in its nature is final. S. v. Bailey, 65 N. C., 426; S. v. Jefferson, 66 N. C., 309; S. v. Wiseman, 68 N. C., 203; S. v. Webb, 155 N. C., 426; S. v. Tripp, 168 N. C., 150.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . Cornett, 150 S.E. 113, 197 N.C. 627, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 319 (N.C. 1929).

150 S.E. 113 (State v. . Cornett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wyatt v. Baker
154 S.E. 816 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
State v. . McIver
94 S.E. 682 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1917)