State v. Scott

145 S.W.3d 869, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1457, 2004 WL 2282619
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Scott. Read the opinion of the Court — 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1525
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 12, 2004·No. No. WD 62835·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted Appellant James Scott of first-degree robbery and armed criminal action. The trial court sentenced him as a prior and persistent offender to concurrent prison terms of twenty-five years.

On appeal from the judgment entered upon his conviction, Appellant maintains that the trial court erred in admitting his co-defendant’s cell phone and testimony concerning call log entries from the phone. He claims that the State did not establish the necessary foundation for the admission of the cell phone evidence, nor did it properly establish the chain of custody of the cell phone.

We affirm. Rule 80.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Scott, 145 S.W.3d 869, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1457, 2004 WL 2282619 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

145 S.W.3d 869 (State v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.