State v. Scott

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Scott

81 S.W.3d 594, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1018, 2002 WL 976039

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 14, 2002

DocketNo. WD 59977

StatusPublished

This text of 81 S.W.3d 594 (State v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Scott, 81 S.W.3d 594, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1018, 2002 WL 976039 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Appellant Jai T. Scott appeals his conviction of the class A felony of Trafficking in the Second Degree, § 195.223, RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no prec-edential or jurisprudential value. Howev[595]*595er, the parties have been furnished -with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Appellant Jai T. Scott appeals his conviction of the class A felony of Trafficking in the Second Degree, § 195.223, RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no prec-edential or jurisprudential value. Howev[595]*595er, the parties have been furnished -with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 S.W.3d 594, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1018, 2002 WL 976039, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-scott-moctapp-2002.