State v. Scott

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Scott

124 S.W.3d 528, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 85, 2004 WL 119341

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 27, 2004

DocketNo. WD 62228

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 124 S.W.3d 528 (State v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Scott, 124 S.W.3d 528, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 85, 2004 WL 119341 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dedric A. Scott appeals the judgment of his convictions, after a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, for one count of murder in the second degree, § 565.021; one count of assault in the first degree, § 565.050; and two counts of armed criminal action (ACA), § 571.015. As a result of his convictions, the appellant was sentenced to concurrent prison terms, in the Missouri Department of Corrections, of thirty years for murder, fifteen years for assault, and life imprisonment for both counts of ACA.

In his sole point on appeal, the appellant claims that the trial court erred in allowing the State, over his objection, to argue in its closing argument facts outside the record.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dedric A. Scott appeals the judgment of his convictions, after a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, for one count of murder in the second degree, § 565.021; one count of assault in the first degree, § 565.050; and two counts of armed criminal action (ACA), § 571.015. As a result of his convictions, the appellant was sentenced to concurrent prison terms, in the Missouri Department of Corrections, of thirty years for murder, fifteen years for assault, and life imprisonment for both counts of ACA.

In his sole point on appeal, the appellant claims that the trial court erred in allowing the State, over his objection, to argue in its closing argument facts outside the record.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 S.W.3d 528, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 85, 2004 WL 119341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-scott-moctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack