Scott v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Scott v. State

272 S.W.3d 304, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1382, 2008 WL 4547503

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 14, 2008

DocketWD 68324

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 272 S.W.3d 304 (Scott v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. State, 272 S.W.3d 304, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1382, 2008 WL 4547503 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mr. Dedric Scott appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his post-conviction relief motion after an evidentiary hearing. He claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call an expert to refute the State’s expert testimony concerning the condition of a bullet found at the scene.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mr. Dedric Scott appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his post-conviction relief motion after an evidentiary hearing. He claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call an expert to refute the State’s expert testimony concerning the condition of a bullet found at the scene.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 S.W.3d 304, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1382, 2008 WL 4547503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-state-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack