Scott v. State
272 S.W.3d 304, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1382, 2008 WL 4547503
Opinion
ORDER
Mr. Dedric Scott appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his post-conviction relief motion after an evidentiary hearing. He claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call an expert to refute the State’s expert testimony concerning the condition of a bullet found at the scene.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scott v. State, 272 S.W.3d 304, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1382, 2008 WL 4547503 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
272 S.W.3d 304 (Scott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kelly v. State
272 S.W.3d 304 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)