State v. Scott

9 S.W.3d 624, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 1923, 1999 WL 759591
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 28, 1999·No. No. ED 75006·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Harold Scott (Defendant) appeals from a judgment of conviction on two counts of first-degree robbery, Section 569.020, RSMo 1994; one count of first-degree assault, Section 565.050, RSMo 1994; and three counts of armed criminal action, Section 571.015, RSMo 1994. Defendant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to six concurrent terms of thirty years’ imprisonment.

We have reviewed the' briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Scott, 9 S.W.3d 624, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 1923, 1999 WL 759591 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).

9 S.W.3d 624 (State v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott v. State
183 S.W.3d 244 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)