State v. Scott

959 S.W.2d 938, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 108, 1998 WL 21761
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 20, 1998·No. No. 71096·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Scott, III (Defendant) appeals from the judgment on his conviction by a jury of unlawful possession of a eoncealable firearm, section 571.070 RSMo 1986, kidnapping, section 565.110 RSMo 1986, and armed criminal action, 571.015 RSMo 1986. Defendant was also found to be a prior and persistent offender, sections 558.016 and 557.036.4 RSMo 1992, and sentenced to concurrent terms of imprisonment of twenty years, thirty years, and thirty years, respectively.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-[939]*939dential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Scott, 959 S.W.2d 938, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 108, 1998 WL 21761 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).

959 S.W.2d 938 (State v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott v. State
20 S.W.3d 606 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2000)