State v. Scott
924 S.W.2d 49, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1080, 1996 WL 329911
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Scott. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1090 →
Opinion
ORDER
A jury convicted Jesse Scott of possessing marijuana and cocaine while being held in prison. He asserts that the circuit court plainly erred by requiring him to wear restraints at trial. He also asks us to review the prosecutor’s closing argument as plain error. We do not find plain error in either case and, therefore, do not review the unpre-served issues pursuant to Rule 30.20. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Scott, 924 S.W.2d 49, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1080, 1996 WL 329911 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).
924 S.W.2d 49 (State v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.