Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/State v. Scott

State v. Scott

873 S.W.2d 342, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 613, 1994 WL 120143
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Scott. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1090 →
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 12, 1994·No. No. 63728·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. Finding no error, we affirm. Further, we find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only.

Judgment and sentence affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Scott, 873 S.W.2d 342, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 613, 1994 WL 120143 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

873 S.W.2d 342 (State v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.