State v. Saxon

42 Ind. 484
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1873·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Pettit, J.

There is no question in this case properly presented by the transcript for our consideration. The only one attempted to be raised or presented is as to the taxation of costs. The entry of the clerk shows that a motion was made for that purpose and ruled upon by the court. Time was given to file a bill of exceptions, but none was filed, which was essential to present the question of the proper or improper action of the court below on the motion to this court. Urton v. Luckey, 17 Ind. 213; Smawley v. Stark, 16 Ind. 371; Conner v. Winton, 10 Ind. 25.

The judgment is affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Saxon, 42 Ind. 484 (Ind. 1873).

42 Ind. 484 (State v. Saxon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gallimore v. Blankenship
99 Ind. 390 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1885)
Beard v. Hand
88 Ind. 183 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1882)