Urton v. Luckey

17 Ind. 213, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 360
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided December 3, 1861·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Worden J.

Suit by the appellee against the appellant, on a special conüact, and ibr work and labor. Trial by jury; verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, for $33.26.

Two grounds only are urged for the reversal of the judgment. First, that the Court erred in overruling a demurrer to the third paragraph of the complaint; and, second, that the Court erred in refusing to tax the costs to the plaintiff.

The demurrer was to the entire complaint, and not separate to the third paragraph. If the third paragraph be bad, there was no error in overruling the demurrer, the others being good.

In reference to the costs, the clerk states in the transcript that a motion was made to tax the costs to the plaintiff, and overruled, and that the defendant excepted.

There is no bill of exceptions showing these matters; and without a bill of exceptions, as has been held in several cases, they are no part of the record, and cannot be noticed by this Court.

Per Gu'riam. — The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Urton v. Luckey, 17 Ind. 213, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 360 (Ind. 1861).

17 Ind. 213 (Urton v. Luckey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gallimore v. Blankenship
99 Ind. 390 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1885)
Millikan v. Temple
94 Ind. 261 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1883)
Beard v. Hand
88 Ind. 183 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1882)
Lippman v. City of South Bend
84 Ind. 276 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1882)
State v. Saxon
42 Ind. 484 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1873)
Jewett v. Honey Creek Draining Co.
39 Ind. 245 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1872)
Sherman v. Nixon
37 Ind. 153 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1871)