Urton v. Luckey
This text of 17 Ind. 213 (Urton v. Luckey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Suit by the appellee against the appellant, on a special conüact, and ibr work and labor. Trial by jury; verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, for $33.26.
Two grounds only are urged for the reversal of the judgment. First, that the Court erred in overruling a demurrer to the third paragraph of the complaint; and, second, that the Court erred in refusing to tax the costs to the plaintiff.
The demurrer was to the entire complaint, and not separate to the third paragraph. If the third paragraph be bad, there was no error in overruling the demurrer, the others being good.
In reference to the costs, the clerk states in the transcript that a motion was made to tax the costs to the plaintiff, and overruled, and that the defendant excepted.
There is no bill of exceptions showing these matters; and without a bill of exceptions, as has been held in several cases, they are no part of the record, and cannot be noticed by this Court.
Per Gu'riam. — The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 Ind. 213, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/urton-v-luckey-ind-1861.