Smawley v. Stark
This text of 16 Ind. 371 (Smawley v. Stark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion for re-taxation of costs in the Court below. The motion was founded upon a written statement, setting out the items alleged to hare been taxed by the clerk to the several parties. The motion was submitted to the Court, and overruled. A bill of exceptions shows the foregoing facts; thus making a case falling within the rule laid down in Conner v. Winton, 10 Ind. 25. But though the appellant got his case rightly before the Court below, he has not got it before this Court. Neither the evidence, nor grounds upon which the Court below decided, are in the record.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 Ind. 371, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smawley-v-stark-ind-1861.