State v. Sandlin

110 S.E.2d 481, 251 N.C. 81, 1959 N.C. LEXIS 511
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 14, 1959·No. 146·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER Ourtam

Defendants were not charged with murder, but an assault. It was error to place on them the burden of proving they acted in self-defence. S. v. Warren, 242 N.C. 581, 89 S.E. 2d 109; S. v. Muscat, 247 N.C. 266, 100 S.E. 2d 510.

New trial.

Higgins, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Sandlin, 110 S.E.2d 481, 251 N.C. 81, 1959 N.C. LEXIS 511 (N.C. 1959).

110 S.E.2d 481 (State v. Sandlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Turner
222 S.E.2d 745 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1976)
State v. Fletcher
150 S.E.2d 54 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1966)
State v. Cloer
146 S.E.2d 815 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1966)