State v. Muscat

100 S.E.2d 510, 247 N.C. 266, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 676
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 27, 1957
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 100 S.E.2d 510 (State v. Muscat) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Muscat, 100 S.E.2d 510, 247 N.C. 266, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 676 (N.C. 1957).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Certain portion of the charge of the trial judge to the jury in respect to defendant’s plea of self-defense, to which defendant excepts, while proper in trial of a homicide case, the Attorney General confesses is improper in instant case, and is prejudicial to defendant, under authority of S. v. Warren, 242 N.C. 581, 89 S.E. 2d, 109; S. v. Cephus, 239 N.C. 521, 80 S.E 2d, 147; S. v. Carver, 213 N.C. 150, 195 S.E. 349.

Hence let there be a

New trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Sandlin
110 S.E.2d 481 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 S.E.2d 510, 247 N.C. 266, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-muscat-nc-1957.