State v. Muscat
100 S.E.2d 510, 247 N.C. 266, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 676
Opinion
Certain portion of the charge of the trial judge to the jury in respect to defendant’s plea of self-defense, to which defendant excepts, while proper in trial of a homicide case, the Attorney General confesses is improper in instant case, and is prejudicial to defendant, under authority of S. v. Warren, 242 N.C. 581, 89 S.E. 2d, 109; S. v. Cephus, 239 N.C. 521, 80 S.E 2d, 147; S. v. Carver, 213 N.C. 150, 195 S.E. 349.
Hence let there be a
New trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Muscat, 100 S.E.2d 510, 247 N.C. 266, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 676 (N.C. 1957).
100 S.E.2d 510 (State v. Muscat) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Sandlin
110 S.E.2d 481 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1959)