State v. Cloer
146 S.E.2d 815, 266 N.C. 672, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1418
Opinion
The defendant was not charged with murder, but an assault. It was error to place on him the burden of proving that [673] he acted in self-defense. S. v. Sandlin, 251 N.C. 81, 110 S.E. 2d 481 and cases there cited.
The defendant is entitled to a
New trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Cloer, 146 S.E.2d 815, 266 N.C. 672, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1418 (N.C. 1966).
146 S.E.2d 815 (State v. Cloer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Turner
222 S.E.2d 745 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1976)
State v. Fletcher
150 S.E.2d 54 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1966)