State v. Russell

161 S.W.3d 420, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 706, 2005 WL 1084617
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Russell. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 524
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 10, 2005·No. No. WD 64298·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Walter Russell appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance in or about the premises of a correctional center, section 217.360, RSMo 2000, and sentence as a prior and persistent offender to fifteen years imprisonment. He claims that the trial court plainly erred in failing to grant a new trial based on a discovery violation by the State. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Russell, 161 S.W.3d 420, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 706, 2005 WL 1084617 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

161 S.W.3d 420 (State v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.