State v. Russell

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Russell

161 S.W.3d 420, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 706, 2005 WL 1084617

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 10, 2005

DocketNo. WD 64298

StatusPublished

This text of 161 S.W.3d 420 (State v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Russell, 161 S.W.3d 420, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 706, 2005 WL 1084617 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Walter Russell appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance in or about the premises of a correctional center, section 217.360, RSMo 2000, and sentence as a prior and persistent offender to fifteen years imprisonment. He claims that the trial court plainly erred in failing to grant a new trial based on a discovery violation by the State. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Walter Russell appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance in or about the premises of a correctional center, section 217.360, RSMo 2000, and sentence as a prior and persistent offender to fifteen years imprisonment. He claims that the trial court plainly erred in failing to grant a new trial based on a discovery violation by the State. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

161 S.W.3d 420, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 706, 2005 WL 1084617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-russell-moctapp-2005.